Fangran Tian vs Kallista Liu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 02 Jul at 02:35 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
F. Tian vs K. Liu

CHN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Tian 1 - 0 Liu
They have played 2 sets in total, with Fangran Tian winning 2 and Kallista Liu winning 0. The last match between Fangran Tian and Kallista Liu was at the W15 Hong Kong, 02-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Fangran Tian getting the victory 6-1 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tian | 1 |
| Liu | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Hong Kong(07-02-25)
F. Tian vs K. Liu H2H Profile
F. Tian vs K. Liu Match Preview:
- Which player has a stronger second serve performance in the last six months? Tian slightly outperforms Liu, winning 40.51% compared to Liu's 38.02%, which can be a key factor in match prediction.
- Who excels more in returning second serves? Liu leads by winning 51.18% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tian secures 47.32%.
- For first serve returns, Liu again edges out with a success rate of 38.28% compared to Tian's 37.6%.
- Both players are relatively effective under pressure, with Liu saving 39.42% of breakpoints and Tian saving 38.69%.
- Considering overall match performance over the last year, Tian boasts a higher win rate at 67.86% compared to Liu's 48%.
- Which surface favors each player? Tian's strongest surface is Hard (73% win rate), while Liu's strength is on I.hard (67%).
- Analyzing tournament levels, Tian has shown more success at Challengers/ITF tournaments, achieving a 68% win rate, while Liu holds a 52.17% win rate in similar events.
- Regarding opponent quality, Tian's opponents have been on average ranked higher (394.46) compared to Liu's (403.52).
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Liu has a significant advantage, winning 50% compared to Tian’s 29% success rate.
- Break point conversion is close, with Tian converting 48.75% and Liu 47.14%, indicating both players are almost equally efficient at taking crucial points.
Editorial Prediction (July 2, 2025, UTC):
When examining recent second serve performance, Tian has shown a slight edge over Liu. This strength, combined with a strong match win percentage over the last year, positions Tian favorably.
Liu, however, demonstrates superior abilities in return games, particularly against second serves, which could be crucial in turning the match in their favor.
While both players show comparable skills under pressure, Tian's higher experience and success rate on the surface expected for this match could prove advantageous.
Liu’s ability to perform better in deciding sets suggests they have the mental fortitude to overcome challenging situations.
Considering Tian's overall stronger performance and win rate, he is predicted to be the likely winner of this forthcoming tennis match.
Fangran Tian vs Kallista Liu Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
F. Tian vs K. Liu H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:2:23 | Average Match Time | 1:2:23 |
| 73% (24/33) | 1st Serve % | 74% (29/39) |
| 79% (19/24) | 1st Serve Win % | 31% (9/29) |
| 33% (3/9) | 2nd Serve Win % | 10% (1/10) |
| 100% (7/7) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) |
| 74% (29/39) | Return Points Win % | 33% (11/33) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
F. Tian Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | W | 6-0 2-6 6-4 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-2 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-0 6-0 | ||
R1 | L | 2-6 7-5 6-1 | ||
SF | L | 3-6 6-1 6-3 | ||
K. Liu Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 7-5 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-6(4) 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||

F. Tian vs K. Liu Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 72.25% (125/48) | YTD Win/Loss | 40.82% (20/29) |
| 69.74% (265/115) | Sets Win/Loss | 41.75% (43/60) |
| 60.26% (1965/1296) | Games Win/Loss | 47.64% (445/489) |
| 73.94% (105/37) | Hard Win/Loss | 36.67% (11/19) |
| 66.67% (20/10) | Clay Win/Loss | 46.67% (7/8) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 159 | Aces Total | 10 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 281 | Total Double Faults | 61 |
| 1:32:32 | Average Match Time | 1:14:18 |
| 454.5 | Average Opponent Rank | 318.1 |
| 65% (6109/9383) | 1st Serve % | 71% (1653/2340) |
| 61% (3708/6109) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (899/1653) |
| 49% (1620/3274) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (311/687) |
| 56% (754/1340) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (126/248) |
| 52% (4730/9104) | Return Points Win % | 45% (949/2124) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 70.54% (79/33) | Challenger W/L | 43.59% (17/22) |
| 77.97% (46/13) | Futures W/L | 33.33% (3/6) |
| 72% (122/169) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 38% (18/47) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 61% (11/18) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (5/11) |
| 50% (18/36) | Deciding Set Win % | 29% (2/7) |
| 92% (123/113) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (21/19) |
| 8% (123/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (21/2) |
| 20% (49/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 4% (28/1) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Potential H2H Matches This Week
Tian (W75 Sydney)
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Eva Vedder vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

Shintaro Mochizuki vs Federico Arnaboldi Prediction – ATP Bergamo Challenger – 18th November 2025 Best Bets

Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
